Skip to content

Resources

CSAFE’s Latest Resources

Change cannot happen without community. CSAFE is passionate about achieving its mission to apply a statistically sound and scientifically solid foundation to the interpretation of forensic evidence. To that end, we invite fellow scientists and researchers, along with those in the forensic and legal communities, to use and share these resources as we work together to elevate forensic science and technology.

Knowledge Transfer

  • Type

  • Topic Area

Found 158 Results
Page 1 of 16

Statistical Methods for the Forensic Analysis of User-Event Data

Type: , Research Area(s):

Published: 2020 | By: Christopher Galbraith

A common question in forensic analysis is whether two observed data sets originate from the same source or from different sources. Statistical approaches to addressing this question have been widely adopted within the forensics community, particularly for DNA evidence, providing…

View on Digital Repository


Psychometric analysis of forensic examiner behavior

Type: Research Area(s):

Published: 2020 | By: Amanda Luby

Forensic science often involves the comparison of crime-scene evidence to a known-source sample to determine if the evidence and the reference sample came from the same source. Even as forensic analysis tools become increasingly objective and automated, final source identifications…

View on Digital Repository


Juror appraisals of forensic evidence: Effects of blind proficiency and cross-examination

Type: Research Area(s):

Published: 2020 | By: William E. Crozier

Forensic testimony plays a crucial role in many criminal cases, with requests to crime laboratories steadily increasing. As part of efforts to improve the reliability of forensic evidence, scientific and policy groups increasingly recommend routine and blind proficiency tests of…

View on Digital Repository


Statistical Methods for the Forensic Analysis of Geolocated Event Data

Type: Research Area(s):

Published: 2020 | By: Christopher Galbraith

A common question in forensic analysis is whether two observed data sets originated from the same source or from different sources. Statistical approaches to addressing this question have been widely adopted within the forensics community, particularly for DNA evidence. Here…

View on Digital Repository


Implementing blind proficiency testing in forensic laboratories: Motivation, obstacles, and recommendations

Type: Research Area(s):

Published: 2020 | By: Robin Meija

Regular proficiency testing of forensic examiners is required at accredited laboratories and widely accepted as an important component of a functioning quality assurance program. Yet, unlike in other testing industries, the majority of forensic laboratories testing programs rely entirely on…

View on Digital Repository


Statistical models to predict exposure settings using two different iPhone camera apps

Type: Research Area(s):

Published: 2020 | By: Kurt Michael Kabriel

The StegoAppDB [Newman, J. (2019)] is a digital image database containing camera data from Android and iPhone mobile phones and developed for forensic purposes. Taken with a custom-designed camera app called Cameraw rather than the camera app native to the…

View on Digital Repository


Statistical methods for digital image forensics: Algorithm mismatch for blind spatial steganalysis and score-based likelihood ratios for camera device identification

Type: , Research Area(s):

Published: 2020 | By: Stephanie Reinders

Forensic science currently faces a variety of challenges. Statistically suitable reference databases need to be developed and maintained. Subjective methods that can introduce bias need to be replaced by objective methods. Highly technical forensic methods need to be clearly and…

View on Digital Repository


Bayesian hierarchical modeling for the forensic evaluation of handwritten documents

Type: , Research Area(s):

Published: 2020 | By: Amy Crawford

The analysis of handwritten evidence has been used widely in courts in the United States since the 1930s (Osborn, 1946). Traditional evaluations are conducted by trained forensic examiners. More recently, there has been a movement toward objective and probability-based evaluation…

View on Digital Repository


Mock Jurors’ Evaluation of Firearm Examiner Testimony

Type: Research Area(s):

Published: 2020 | By: Brandon L. Garrett

Objectives: Firearms experts traditionally have testified that a weapon leaves “unique” toolmarks, so bullets or cartridge casings can be visually examined and conclusively matched to a particular firearm. Recently, due to scientific critiques, Department of Justice policy, and judges’ rulings,…

View on Digital Repository


Mock Juror Perceptions of Forensics

Type: Research Area(s): ,

This CSAFE Center Wide webinar was presented on December 8, 2020 by: Brandon Garrett – L. Neil Williams Professor of Law, Faculty Director at the Wilson Center for Science and Justice Nicholas Scurich – Associate Professor of Criminology, Law &…


Page 1 of 16