Skip to content

Implementation and Practice

Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

November 30, 2022 / /
This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of
Read More

Jury Perception of Bullet Matching Algorithms and Demonstrative Evidence

November 30, 2022 / /
Presented at Joint Statistical Meetings
Read More

Unpacking the Sources of Error in Forensic Evidence

November 29, 2022 / /
An overview of the Autopsy of a Crime Lab book and the ways in which error can occur in forensic evidence
Read More

Autopsy of a Crime Lab: Addressing the Sources of Error in Forensics

September 21, 2022 / /
Keynote presentation:  Autopsy of a Crime Lab book and overview of IMPL 1 Project Area
Read More

Ensemble SLRs for Forensic Evidence Comparison

August 26, 2022 / / , ,
This CSAFE webinar was held on August 25, 2022. Presenter: Danica Ommen Assistant Professor – Department of Statistics, Iowa State University Presentation Description: To strengthen the statistical foundations of forensic
Read More

Does Image Editing Improve the Quality of Latent Prints? An Analysis of Image‐Enhancement Techniques in One Crime Laboratory

July 20, 2022 / / ,
The following was presented at the 74th Annual Scientific Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Seattle, Washington, February 21-25, 2022
Read More

What types of information can and do latent print examiners review? A survey of practicing examiners

July 20, 2022 / / ,
The following was presented at the 74th Annual Scientific Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Seattle, Washington, February 21-25, 2022.
Read More

Investigative Leads in Latent Prints: A Comparison of Laboratory Procedures

July 20, 2022 / / ,
The following was presented at the 74th Annual Scientific Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Seattle, Washington, February 21-25, 2022.
Read More

Characterizing verification and blind proficiency testing at forensic laboratories

July 20, 2022 / / ,
The 2014 Bureau of Justice survey of publicly funded forensic crime laboratories found that while 97% of the country’s 409 public forensic labs reported using some kind of proficiency testing,
Read More

How do latent print examiners perceive blind proficiency testing? A survey of practicing examiners

July 19, 2022 / / ,
The current study sought to explore perceptions of BPT among practicing latent print examiners and determine whether such beliefs varied between examiners who work for laboratories with and without BPT.
Read More
« Prev1234567Next »