Forensic practitioners determine whether two marks were generated by the same tool by observing the 2D images of the marks using a comparison microscope and deciding whether the “surface contours of two toolmarks are in sufficient agreement” based on the examiner’s subjective opinion that another tool could not have made the marks. Objective measures produce consistent results, have transparent processes, and have less uncertainty in conclusions. This study proposes a novel algorithm (an objective method) for forensic toolmark comparisons that can compare marks made at different angles and directions, and provide a measure of uncertainty.
Forensic Toolmark Comparisons
Conference/Workshop:
Joint Statistical Meetings
Joint Statistical Meetings
Published: 2023
Primary Author: Maria Cuellar
Secondary Authors: Heike Hofmann, Sheng Gao, Shane Jensen
Type: Presentation Slides
Research Area: Firearms and Toolmarks
Related Resources
Advancing the Understanding of 3D Imaging for Firearms Identification
Houston Forensic Science Center, in collaboration with CSAFE, has been awarded an NIJ grant to conduct a study focused on comparability of images acquired by 3D instruments manufactured by different…
Algorithmic matching of striated tool marks
Automatic matching algorithms for assessing the similarity between striation marks have been investigated for bullet lands and some tool marks, such as screwdrivers. We are interested in the investigation of…
A reproducible pipeline for extracting representative signals from wire cuts
We propose a reproducible pipeline for extracting representative signals from 2D topographic scans of the tips of cut wires. The process fully addresses many potential problems in the quality of…
An algorithm for forensic toolmark comparisons
Forensic toolmark analysis traditionally relies on subjective human judgment, leading to inconsistencies and lack of transparency. The multitude of variables, including angles and directions of mark generation, further complicates comparisons.…