Forensic practitioners determine whether two marks were generated by the same tool by observing the 2D images of the marks using a comparison microscope and deciding whether the “surface contours of two toolmarks are in sufficient agreement” based on the examiner’s subjective opinion that another tool could not have made the marks. Objective measures produce consistent results, have transparent processes, and have less uncertainty in conclusions. This study proposes a novel algorithm (an objective method) for forensic toolmark comparisons that can compare marks made at different angles and directions, and provide a measure of uncertainty.
Forensic Toolmark Comparisons
Conference/Workshop:
Joint Statistical Meetings
Joint Statistical Meetings
Published: 2023
Primary Author: Maria Cuellar
Secondary Authors: Heike Hofmann, Sheng Gao, Shane Jensen
Type: Presentation Slides
Research Area: Firearms and Toolmarks
Related Resources
Computational Shoeprint Analysis for Forensic Science
Shoeprints are a common type of evidence found at crime scenes and are regularly used in forensic investigations. However, their utility is limited by the lack of reference footwear databases…
Challenges in Modeling, Interpreting, and Drawing Conclusions from Images as Forensic Evidence
When a crime is committed, law enforcement directs crime scene experts to obtain evidence that may be pertinent to identifying the perpetrator(s). Much of this evidence comes in the form…
Aligning Shoeprint Images that have nonlinear distortion effects
Shoeprints are aligned before assessing similarity, and automatic alignment algorithms can handle differences in translation, rotation [1], and scale. But shoeprints recorded at a crime scene may be partials photographed…
Graph-Theoretic Techniques for Forensic Image Comparisons
This presentation is from the 76th Annual Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Denver, Colorado, February 19-24, 2024.