Bullet matching is a process used to determine whether two bullets may have been fired from the same gun barrel. Historically, this has been a manual process performed by trained forensic examiners. Recent work, however, has shown that it is possible to add statistical validity and objectivity to the procedure. In this article, we build upon the algorithms explored in Automatic Matching of Bullet Lands (Hare, Hofmann & Carriquiry (2017), Automatic matching of bullet lands. ArXiv E-Prints) by formalizing and defining a set of features, computed on pairs of bullet lands, which can be used in machine learning models to assess the probability of a match. We then use these features to perform an analysis of the two Hamby (Hamby, Brundage & Thorpe (2009), The identification of bullets fired from 10 consecutively rifled 9 mm Ruger pistol barrels: a research project involving 507 participants from 20 countries. AFTE J., 41, 99–110) bullet sets (Set 252 and Set 44), to assess the presence of microscope operator effects in scanning. We also take some first steps to address the issue of degraded bullet lands and provide a range of degradation at which the matching algorithm still performs well. Finally, we discuss generalizing land-to-land comparisons to full bullet comparisons as would be used for this procedure in a criminal justice situation.
Algorithmic approaches to match degraded land impressions

Journal: Law, Probability and Risk
Published: 2017
Primary Author: Eric Hare
Secondary Authors: Heike Hofmann, Alicia Carriquiry
Type: Publication
Research Area: Firearms and Toolmarks
Related Resources
Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae
Learning Objectives: Attendees will learn about the protocols developed to assess the content of latent print examiners’ responses to questions about use of minutiae frequencies in case work as well…
Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae
Learning Objectives: Attendees will learn about the protocols developed to assess the content of latent print examiners’ responses to questions about use of minutiae frequencies in case work as well…
Examiner consistency in perceptions of fingerprint minutia rarity
Friction ridge examiners (FREs) identify distinctive features (minutiae) in fingerprints and consider how rare these observed minutiae are in their decisions about both the value of a fingerprint and whether…
A Survey of Naming Conventions for Different Minutia Types in Friction Ridge Examination
Latent print examiners (LPEs) consider the type and rarity of the features found within friction ridge impressions when determining the suitability of questioned impressions for comparison and when forming opinions…

