Skip to content

Algorithmic approaches to match degraded land impressions

Journal: Law, Probability and Risk
Published: 2017
Primary Author: Eric Hare
Secondary Authors: Heike Hofmann, Alicia Carriquiry
Research Area: Firearms and Toolmarks

Bullet matching is a process used to determine whether two bullets may have been fired from the same gun barrel. Historically, this has been a manual process performed by trained forensic examiners. Recent work, however, has shown that it is possible to add statistical validity and objectivity to the procedure. In this article, we build upon the algorithms explored in Automatic Matching of Bullet Lands (Hare, Hofmann & Carriquiry (2017), Automatic matching of bullet lands. ArXiv E-Prints) by formalizing and defining a set of features, computed on pairs of bullet lands, which can be used in machine learning models to assess the probability of a match. We then use these features to perform an analysis of the two Hamby (Hamby, Brundage & Thorpe (2009), The identification of bullets fired from 10 consecutively rifled 9 mm Ruger pistol barrels: a research project involving 507 participants from 20 countries. AFTE J., 41, 99–110) bullet sets (Set 252 and Set 44), to assess the presence of microscope operator effects in scanning. We also take some first steps to address the issue of degraded bullet lands and provide a range of degradation at which the matching algorithm still performs well. Finally, we discuss generalizing land-to-land comparisons to full bullet comparisons as would be used for this procedure in a criminal justice situation.

Related Resources

A Study in Reproducibility: The Congruent Matching Cells Algorithm and cmcR Package

A Study in Reproducibility: The Congruent Matching Cells Algorithm and cmcR Package

Scientific research is driven by our ability to use methods, procedures, and materials from previous studies and further research by adding to it. As the need for computationally-intensive methods to…
CSAFE Project Update & ASCLD FRC Collaboration

CSAFE Project Update & ASCLD FRC Collaboration

This presentation highlighted CSAFE’s collaboration with the ASCLD FRC Collaboration Hub.
Judging Firearms Evidence

Judging Firearms Evidence

Firearms violence results in hundreds of thousands of criminal investigations each year. To try to identify a culprit, firearms examiners seek to link fired shell casings or bullets from crime…
Blind Testing and Blind Verification in Firearms

Blind Testing and Blind Verification in Firearms

This workshop provides a summary of the Houston Forensic Science Center’s blind quality control program, focusing on blind quality control and blind verification in the Firearms section. The presenters will…