Skip to content

CSAFE 2021 Field Update

The 2021 Field Update was held June 14, 2021, and served as the closing to the first year of CSAFE 2.0.

CSAFE brought together researchers, forensic science partners and interested community members to highlight the organization’s achievements, identify areas for collaboration, and discuss goals for the future. It was an opportunity to connect with innovative experts in statistical foundations, pattern and digital evidence, and training and education to learn from each other and discuss potential collaborations.

The available insights, presentation slides, and recordings of the research updates are available below. All videos, along with other CSAFE webinars, can be viewed on the CSAFE YouTube channel.

Session 1: Insights from the Inside

Implementing Blind Proficiency Testing in Forensic Laboratories: Motivation, Obstacles, and Recommendations
Robin Mejia, Carnegie Mellon University

Judges and Forensic Science Education: A National Survey
Brandon Garrett, Duke University

Mt. Everest—We are Going to Lose Many: A Survey of Fingerprint Examiners’ Attitudes Towards Probabilistic Reporting
Simon Cole, University of California, Irvine

Treatment of Inconclusive Results in Error Rates of Firearms Studies
Heike Hofmann, Iowa State University

A Field Analysis of Laboratory Case Processing: Print Comparison and Examiner Conclusions
Brett Gardner, University of Virginia and Maddisen Neuman, Houston Forensic Science Center

Psychometric Analysis of Forensic Examiner Behavior
Amanda Luby, Swarthmore College

A Clustering Method for Graphical Handwriting Components and Statistical Writership Analysis
Alicia Carriquiry, Iowa State University

Statistical Methods for the Forensic Analysis of Geolocated Event Data
Padhraic Smyth, University of California, Irvine

EviHunter: An Android Application Forensic Artifacts Database
Yong Guan, Iowa State University

Session 2: What’s Next at CSAFE

Evaluating Foundational Validity of Toolmark Analysis
Maria Cuellar, University of Pennsylvania

Subclass Characterization and Analysis of Firearms
Keith Morris, West Virginia University

Statistical Methods for Bloodstain Pattern Analysis
Hal Stern, University of California, Irvine

Statistical Models for the Generation and Interpretation of Footwear Impression Evidence
Charless Fowlkes, University of California, Irvine

Session 3: Applying Algorithms to Forensic Science Analysis

Part 1: Discover algorithmic approaches currently being implemented in forensic science labs and disciplines.

Part 2: Consider the ethical implications of algorithms and when they should or should not be explored as an option.

Related Resources

Close Non-Matches and Database Searches

Close Non-Matches and Database Searches

This presentation is from the 77th Annual Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Baltimore, Maryland, February 17-22, 2025.f
Quantitative Similarity Assessments of Forensic Images

Quantitative Similarity Assessments of Forensic Images

This presentation is from the 77th Annual Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Baltimore, Maryland, February 17-22, 2025.
Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons

Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons

Reviews conducted by the National Academy of Sciences (2009) and the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2016) concluded that the field of forensic firearm comparisons has not…
Interoperability Study of 3D Instruments Used in Firearms Identification

Interoperability Study of 3D Instruments Used in Firearms Identification

In forensic firearms identification, one of the newest emerging technologies is three-dimensional (3D) imaging. The 3D technology allows firearms examiners to virtually compare high-resolution 3D images of the surfaces of…