Skip to content

Latent Print

Modeling Covarying Responses in Complex Tasks

November 30, 2022 / /
In testing situations, participants are often asked for supplementary re- sponses in addition to the primary response of interest, which may in- clude quantities like confidence or reported difficulty. These
Read More

Analyzing spatial responses: A comparison of IRT- based approaches, Conference Presentation

November 30, 2022 / /
We investigate two approaches for analyzing spatial coordinate responses using models inspired by Item Response Theory (IRT). In the first, we use a two-stage approach to first construct a pseudoresponse
Read More

Characterizing Variability in Forensic Decision-Making with Item Response Theory

November 30, 2022 / /
This presentation is from the 2022 Joint Statistical Meetings
Read More

Measuring Proficiency among Latent Print Examiners: A Statistical Approach from Standardized Testing

November 30, 2022 / / ,
This presentation is from the 74th Annual Scientific Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences
Read More

Does Image Editing Improve the Quality of Latent Prints? An Analysis of Image‐Enhancement Techniques in One Crime Laboratory

July 20, 2022 / / ,
The following was presented at the 74th Annual Scientific Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Seattle, Washington, February 21-25, 2022
Read More

What types of information can and do latent print examiners review? A survey of practicing examiners

July 20, 2022 / / ,
The following was presented at the 74th Annual Scientific Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Seattle, Washington, February 21-25, 2022.
Read More

Investigative Leads in Latent Prints: A Comparison of Laboratory Procedures

July 20, 2022 / / ,
The following was presented at the 74th Annual Scientific Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Seattle, Washington, February 21-25, 2022.
Read More

Characterizing verification and blind proficiency testing at forensic laboratories

July 20, 2022 / / ,
The 2014 Bureau of Justice survey of publicly funded forensic crime laboratories found that while 97% of the country’s 409 public forensic labs reported using some kind of proficiency testing,
Read More

How do latent print examiners perceive blind proficiency testing? A survey of practicing examiners

July 19, 2022 / / ,
The current study sought to explore perceptions of BPT among practicing latent print examiners and determine whether such beliefs varied between examiners who work for laboratories with and without BPT.
Read More

Latent Print Quality in Blind Proficiency Testing: Using Quality Metrics to Examine Laboratory Performance

March 18, 2022 / / ,
Presented at American Association of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) 2021
Read More
« Prev123456Next »