The following was presented at the 74th Annual Scientific Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Seattle, Washington, February 21-25, 2022.
What types of information can and do latent print examiners review? A survey of practicing examiners
Conference/Workshop:
American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS)
American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS)
Published: 2022
Primary Author: Brett Gardner
Secondary Authors: Sharon Kelley, Maddisen Neuman
Type: Presentation Slides
Related Resources
Does image editing improve the quality of latent prints? An analysis of image-editing techniques in one crime laboratory
Field research within latent print comparison has remained sparse in the context of an otherwise growing body of literature examining the discipline. Studies examining how ACE-V procedures are implemented within…
Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process
This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of…
Jury Perception of Bullet Matching Algorithms and Demonstrative Evidence
Presented at Joint Statistical Meetings
Modeling Covarying Responses in Complex Tasks
In testing situations, participants are often asked for supplementary re- sponses in addition to the primary response of interest, which may in- clude quantities like confidence or reported difficulty. These…