Skip to content

Modeling Covarying Responses in Complex Tasks

Conference/Workshop:
Quantitative Psychology: The 86th Annual International Meeting of the Psychometric Society
Published: 2022
Primary Author: Amanda Luby
Research Area: Latent Print

In testing situations, participants are often asked for supplementary re- sponses in addition to the primary response of interest, which may in- clude quantities like confidence or reported difficulty. These additional responses can be incorporated into a psychometric model either as a predictor of the main response or as a secondary response. In this paper we explore both of these approaches for incorporating participant’s re- ported difficulty into a psychometric model using an error rate study of fingerprint examiners. Participants were asked to analyze print pairs and make determinations about the source, which can be scored as correct or incorrect decisions. Additionally, participants were asked to report the difficulty of the print pair on a five point scale. In this paper, we model (a) the responses of individual examiners without incorporating reported difficulty using a Rasch model, (b) the responses using their reported dif- ficulty as a predictor, and (c) the responses and their reported difficulty as a multivariate response variable. We find that approach (c) results in more balanced classification errors, but incorporating reported difficulty using either approach does not lead to substantive changes in proficiency or difficulty estimates. These results suggest that, while there are indi- vidual differences in reported difficulty, these differences appear to be unrelated to examiners’ proficiency in correctly distinguishing matched from non-matched fingerprints.

Related Resources

How do Labs Ensure Quality? A Nationwide Review of SOPs for Latent Print Examination

How do Labs Ensure Quality? A Nationwide Review of SOPs for Latent Print Examination

This presentation is from the 108th International Association for Identification (IAI) Annual Educational Conference, Reno, Nevada, August 11-17, 2024. Posted with permission of CSAFE.
Developing a Repeatable and Reproducible Protocol for Establishing Combined Minutiae Frequencies

Developing a Repeatable and Reproducible Protocol for Establishing Combined Minutiae Frequencies

Fingerprint minutia types influence LPEs’ analyses and evaluations during casework, with features perceived as rarer generally given more weight. Last year, we reported on examiner perceptions of minutia type frequency.…
Challenges in Modeling, Interpreting, and Drawing Conclusions from Images as Forensic Evidence

Challenges in Modeling, Interpreting, and Drawing Conclusions from Images as Forensic Evidence

When a crime is committed, law enforcement directs crime scene experts to obtain evidence that may be pertinent to identifying the perpetrator(s). Much of this evidence comes in the form…
Toward Consistency in Latent Print Examiners’ Naming Conventions and Minutiae Frequency Estimations

Toward Consistency in Latent Print Examiners’ Naming Conventions and Minutiae Frequency Estimations

This presentation is from the 76th Annual Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Denver, Colorado, February 19-24, 2024.