The forensics community has recently conducted black-box studies to establish the accuracy and reliability of subjective forensic examination decisions. We have developed a statistical framework to assess the reliability of such subjective decisions that may be on different scales, for example, binary (match/ non-match) or ordered categories. Our methodology also enables inference for interactions between examiners and forensic samples. We also extend our approach to identify groups of examiners that might share decision making abilities or thresholds for decisions for the purpose of understanding reliability within these subgroups.
Studying Reproducibility and Repeatability for Pattern Evidence Comparisons
Conference/Workshop:
International Association for Identification (IAI)
International Association for Identification (IAI)
Published: 2022
Primary Author: Hina Arora
Secondary Authors: Naomi Kaplan-Damary and Hal Stern
Type: Presentation Slides
Related Resources
Forensic Analysis of Android Cloud SDKs
This presentation is from the 76th Annual Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Denver, Colorado, February 19-24, 2024.
Is it a True Match? Top k correlations in a database search
This presentation is from the 76th Annual Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Denver, Colorado, February 19-24, 2024.
Quantifying Bayes Factors for Forensic Handwriting Evidence
This presentation is from the 76th Annual Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Denver, Colorado, February 19-24, 2024.
Quantifying Writer Variance Through Rainbow Triangle Graph Decomposition
This presentation is from the 76th Annual Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Denver, Colorado, February 19-24, 2024