Skip to content

Source Code on Trial

This CSAFE symposium was held on March 12, 2021.

Presenter:

Professor Edward Imwinkelried
Edward L. Barrett, Jr. Professor of Law Emeritus, University of California – Davis School of Law

Panelists:
Professor Ric Simmons, The Ohio State University, Moritz College of Law
Professor Rebecca Wexler, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law
Doctor Mark Perlin, Cybergenetics

Presentation Description:

Over a decade has passed since The National Academy of Forensic Science’s report, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, called on the scientific community to examine the scientific foundations and limitations of various forensic disciplines. The report spurred important collaborations between the criminal justice and scientific communities. As a result, new probabilistic and statistical methods are rapidly being developed to analyze forensic evidence. These methods, while a promising opportunity for a scientific-driven and objective approach to forensic evidence, are implemented through computer programs. The instructions for these programs are contained within the source code.

Now, a natural question is being asked in courts across the country: should criminal defendants have access to the source code of programs used to analyze forensic evidence? In this symposium, we begin to explore the issue of access to source code in criminal trials.

Additional Resources:

Professor Edward Imwinkelried’s Slides
Professor Rebecca Wexler’s Slides

Related Resources

Using mixture models to examine group difference among jurors: an illustration involving the perceived strength of forensic science evidence

Using mixture models to examine group difference among jurors: an illustration involving the perceived strength of forensic science evidence

The way in which jurors perceive reports of forensic evidence is of critical importance, especially in cases of forensic identification evidence that require examiners to compare items and assess whether…
Battling to a draw: Defense expert rebuttal can neutralize prosecution fingerprint evidence

Battling to a draw: Defense expert rebuttal can neutralize prosecution fingerprint evidence

The present study examined whether a defense rebuttal expert can effectively educate jurors on the risk that the prosecution’s fingerprint expert made an error. Using a sample of 1716 jury-eligible…
CSAFE 2021 Field Update

CSAFE 2021 Field Update

The 2021 Field Update was held June 14, 2021, and served as the closing to the first year of CSAFE 2.0. CSAFE brought together researchers, forensic science partners and interested…
Algorithms in Forensic Science: Challenges, Considerations, and a Path Forward

Algorithms in Forensic Science: Challenges, Considerations, and a Path Forward

This CSAFE webinar was held on May 25, 2021. Presenter: Henry Swofford Ph.D. Candidate – University of Lausanne Presentation Description: Over the years, scientific and legal scholars have called for…