Skip to content

Science Bench Book for Judges: Section 4 Introduction to Statistical Thinking for Judges

Journal: Science Bench Book for Judges
Published: 2020
Primary Author: Alicia Carriquiry
Secondary Authors: Eryn Blagg

Alicia Carriquiry, the director of the Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence (CSAFE), and Eryn Blagg, a doctoral student in statistics at Iowa State University, wrote a section on statistics for the newly released second edition of the Science Bench Book for Judges.

The Science Bench Book for Judges was created by the Justice Speakers Institute and The National Judicial College with funding by the State Justice Institute. It is available online, downloadable, searchable and free. It is meant to guide and assist judges during pre-trial, trial and post-trial proceedings in both civil and criminal cases.

The bench book provides judges with an overview of legal procedure involving validity, reliability and admissibility of evidence. It introduces research terminology, concepts and scientific methods and includes case citations, relevant legal authority and evidentiary rulings. It was prepared under the guidance and written by appellate justices, judges, legal scholars and lawyers.

Carriquiry and Blagg’s section, Introduction to Statistical Thinking for Judges, explains some of the common concepts used in statistical analysis. They start by defining the basics, including populations and samples, before moving on to different types of data that might arise in legal proceedings. They also discuss various approaches to collecting data, design of studies, summarizing sample information and making conclusions about a population using information from a sample. Carriquiry and Blagg finish the section by discussing how to assess the quality of data from a sample or a study.

To download the complete bench book, visit http://justicespeakersinstitute.com/science-bench-book/.

To download Carriquiry and Blagg’s section, go to http://justicespeakersinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/4-Statistics.pdf.

Related Resources

What’s in a Name? Consistency in Latent Print Examiners’ Naming Conventions and Perceptions of Minutiae Frequency

What’s in a Name? Consistency in Latent Print Examiners’ Naming Conventions and Perceptions of Minutiae Frequency

Fingerprint minutia types influence LPEs’ decision-making processes during analysis and evaluation, with features perceived to be rarer generally given more weight. However, no large-scale studies comparing examiner perceptions of minutiae…
An alternative statistical framework for measuring proficiency

An alternative statistical framework for measuring proficiency

Item Response Theory, a class of statistical methods used prominently in educational testing, can be used to measure LPE proficiency in annual tests or research studies, while simultaneously accounting for…
Examiner variability in pattern evidence: proficiency, inconclusive tendency, and reporting styles

Examiner variability in pattern evidence: proficiency, inconclusive tendency, and reporting styles

The current approach to characterizing uncertainty in pattern evidence disciplines has focused on error rate studies, which provide aggregated error rates over many examiners and pieces of evidence. However, decisions…
Statistical Interpretation and Reporting of Fingerprint Evidence: FRStat Introduction and Overview

Statistical Interpretation and Reporting of Fingerprint Evidence: FRStat Introduction and Overview

The FRStat is a tool designed to help quantify the strength of fingerprint evidence. Following lengthy development and validation with assistance from CSAFE and NIST, in 2017 the FRStat was…