Skip to content

Science Bench Book for Judges: Section 4 Introduction to Statistical Thinking for Judges

Journal: Science Bench Book for Judges
Published: 2020
Primary Author: Alicia Carriquiry
Secondary Authors: Eryn Blagg

Alicia Carriquiry, the director of the Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence (CSAFE), and Eryn Blagg, a doctoral student in statistics at Iowa State University, wrote a section on statistics for the newly released second edition of the Science Bench Book for Judges.

The Science Bench Book for Judges was created by the Justice Speakers Institute and The National Judicial College with funding by the State Justice Institute. It is available online, downloadable, searchable and free. It is meant to guide and assist judges during pre-trial, trial and post-trial proceedings in both civil and criminal cases.

The bench book provides judges with an overview of legal procedure involving validity, reliability and admissibility of evidence. It introduces research terminology, concepts and scientific methods and includes case citations, relevant legal authority and evidentiary rulings. It was prepared under the guidance and written by appellate justices, judges, legal scholars and lawyers.

Carriquiry and Blagg’s section, Introduction to Statistical Thinking for Judges, explains some of the common concepts used in statistical analysis. They start by defining the basics, including populations and samples, before moving on to different types of data that might arise in legal proceedings. They also discuss various approaches to collecting data, design of studies, summarizing sample information and making conclusions about a population using information from a sample. Carriquiry and Blagg finish the section by discussing how to assess the quality of data from a sample or a study.

To download the complete bench book, visit http://justicespeakersinstitute.com/science-bench-book/.

To download Carriquiry and Blagg’s section, go to http://justicespeakersinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/4-Statistics.pdf.

Related Resources

Forensic Toolmark Comparisons

Forensic Toolmark Comparisons

Forensic practitioners determine whether two marks were generated by the same tool by observing the 2D images of the marks using a comparison microscope and deciding whether the “surface contours…
Effect of Subclass Characteristics on Congruent Matching Cells (CMC) Algorithm

Effect of Subclass Characteristics on Congruent Matching Cells (CMC) Algorithm

This presentation is a continuation of subclass characteristics present on consecutively manufactured breech face inserts. The objective is to assess manufacturing methods similar to those used by firearm manufacturers. It…
Source Camera Identification with Multi-Camera Smartphones

Source Camera Identification with Multi-Camera Smartphones

An overview of source camera identification on multi-camera smartphones, and introduction to the new CSAFE multi-camera smartphone image database, and a summary of recent results on the iPhone 14 Pro’s.
What’s in a Name? Consistency in Latent Print Examiners’ Naming Conventions and Perceptions of Minutiae Frequency

What’s in a Name? Consistency in Latent Print Examiners’ Naming Conventions and Perceptions of Minutiae Frequency

Fingerprint minutia types influence LPEs’ decision-making processes during analysis and evaluation, with features perceived to be rarer generally given more weight. However, no large-scale studies comparing examiner perceptions of minutiae…