This learning module (and associated instructor’s guide) was developed by CSAFE researcher and criminology, law, and society professor from University of California, Irvine Dr. Simon Cole. The educational opportunity uses latent print identification as a case study of the broader category of forensic pattern recognition evidence. This in turn reflects the interaction between science, law, and policy. The module has been explicitly designed for non-scientists from a variety of different backgrounds including law and public policy. Based on an active learning approach, the module is based on scientific and legal literature, policy documents, and court exhibits and opinions. Learn more and view the module on the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine website.
Forensic Pattern Recognition Evidence-An Educational Module
Related Resources
Does image editing improve the quality of latent prints? An analysis of image-editing techniques in one crime laboratory
Field research within latent print comparison has remained sparse in the context of an otherwise growing body of literature examining the discipline. Studies examining how ACE-V procedures are implemented within…
Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process
This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of…
Jury Perception of Bullet Matching Algorithms and Demonstrative Evidence
Presented at Joint Statistical Meetings
Modeling Covarying Responses in Complex Tasks
In testing situations, participants are often asked for supplementary re- sponses in addition to the primary response of interest, which may in- clude quantities like confidence or reported difficulty. These…