Technology today allows a photograph from a digital camera to be matched with the camera that took it. However, the matching software was created over 10 years ago using data that is not necessarily representative of today’s data. The objective of this work is to look at the case where photographs that are acquired are underexposed. The data used for these experiments are taken from StegoAppDB, a forensic imaging database. We obtain the PRNU fingerprints of the cameras and test against fingerprints from other images. Using the peak to correlation energy (PCE) as a similarity metric, the image fingerprint and camera fingerprint are compared. A PCE score less than 60 signifies that the image did not originate from the camera — not a match; otherwise, it did. Error rates for auto-exposed and under-exposed images were based on these comparisons. Using a carefully curated data set of smartphone images, a PCE threshold of 60 results in a false positive rate of 5.86*10-3 when comparing autoexposure fingerprints to underexposure test images.
Camera Device Identification and the Effects of Underexposure
Published: 2023
Primary Author: Seth Pierre
Secondary Authors: Jennifer Newman (Major Professor)
Related Resources
Score-based Likelihood Ratios Using Stylometric Text Embeddings
We consider the problem setting in which we have two sets of texts in digital form and would like to quantify our beliefs that the two sets of texts were…
Statistics and its Applications in Forensic Science and the Criminal Justice System
This presentation is from the 2024 Joint Statistical Meetings (JSM), Portland, Oregon, August 3-8, 2024.
Algorithmic matching of striated tool marks
Automatic matching algorithms for assessing the similarity between striation marks have been investigated for bullet lands and some tool marks, such as screwdrivers. We are interested in the investigation of…
Silencing the Defense Expert
In the wake of the 2009 NRC and 2016 PCAST Reports, the Firearms and Toolmark (FATM) discipline has come under increasing scrutiny. Validation studies like AMES I, Keisler, AMES II,…