Skip to content

Camera Device Identification and the Effects of Underexposure

Published: 2023
Primary Author: Seth Pierre
Secondary Authors: Jennifer Newman (Major Professor)

Technology today allows a photograph from a digital camera to be matched with the camera that took it. However, the matching software was created over 10 years ago using data that is not necessarily representative of today’s data. The objective of this work is to look at the case where photographs that are acquired are underexposed. The data used for these experiments are taken from StegoAppDB, a forensic imaging database. We obtain the PRNU fingerprints of the cameras and test against fingerprints from other images. Using the peak to correlation energy (PCE) as a similarity metric, the image fingerprint and camera fingerprint are compared. A PCE score less than 60 signifies that the image did not originate from the camera — not a match; otherwise, it did. Error rates for auto-exposed and under-exposed images were based on these comparisons. Using a carefully curated data set of smartphone images, a PCE threshold of 60 results in a false positive rate of 5.86*10-3 when comparing autoexposure fingerprints to underexposure test images.

Related Resources

Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae

Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae

Learning Objectives: Attendees will learn about the protocols developed to assess the content of latent print examiners’ responses to questions about use of minutiae frequencies in case work as well…
Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae

Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae

Learning Objectives: Attendees will learn about the protocols developed to assess the content of latent print examiners’ responses to questions about use of minutiae frequencies in case work as well…
Examiner consistency in perceptions of fingerprint minutia rarity

Examiner consistency in perceptions of fingerprint minutia rarity

Friction ridge examiners (FREs) identify distinctive features (minutiae) in fingerprints and consider how rare these observed minutiae are in their decisions about both the value of a fingerprint and whether…
A Survey of Naming Conventions for Different Minutia Types in Friction Ridge Examination

A Survey of Naming Conventions for Different Minutia Types in Friction Ridge Examination

Latent print examiners (LPEs) consider the type and rarity of the features found within friction ridge impressions when determining the suitability of questioned impressions for comparison and when forming opinions…