Skip to content

Creating fingerprint databases and a Bayesian approach to quantify dependencies in evidence

Journal: Online repository of theses and dissertations in the University of Virginia Libraries
Published: 2018
Primary Author: Maria Tackett
Secondary Authors: Under advisement of Dan Spitzner
Research Area: Forensic Statistics

In 2009, the National Research Council issued “Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward” about the need for more scientific rigor in forensic science. Since then, there has been an effort to make the methods used to analyze forensic evidence more objective, in part through the use of statistics to interpret the evidence. With Lindley (1977) as a guide, this research focuses on two aspects of statistics in forensic science. The first is the creation of large databases that can be used for the development and implementation of statistical methods. We propose a theoretical framework for fully-resourced databases that contain sufficient information to be used for these purposes and demonstrate their use in statistical inference, specifically how the databases can be used to systematically obtain prior information in the Bayesian framework. Recommendations are provided for the type of information that can be included in such databases in the context of fingerprint evidence.

The second aspect is quantifying and interpreting the weight of evidence when multiple candidates are examined as the source of a mark recovered from a crime scene. We propose accounting for the dependencies that exist in the weight of evidence for multiple candidates by imposing a constraint on the set of plausible models, and we examine the properties that exist under this constraint. This research is used to inform guidelines for the examination of multiple candidates identified by a fingerprint matching system such as the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS).

Related Resources

Psychometric Analysis of Forensic Examiner Behavior

Psychometric Analysis of Forensic Examiner Behavior

Forensic science often involves the comparison of crime-scene evidence to a known-source sample to determine if the evidence and the reference sample came from the same source. Even as forensic…
CSAFE 2020 All Hands Meeting

CSAFE 2020 All Hands Meeting

The 2020 All Hands Meeting was held May 12 and 13, 2020 and served as the closing to the last 5 years of CSAFE research and focused on kicking off…
Subjective Bayesian testing using calibrated prior probabilities

Subjective Bayesian testing using calibrated prior probabilities

This article proposes a calibration scheme for Bayesian testing that coordinates analytically-derived statistical performance considerations with expert opinion. In other words, the scheme is effective and meaningful for incorporating objective…
Covering the Basic Concepts Surrounding the Weight and Strength of Evidence

Covering the Basic Concepts Surrounding the Weight and Strength of Evidence

This CSAFE Center Wide webinar was presented on January 7, 2019 by Dr. Danica Ommen, CSAFE researcher and Assistant Professor at Iowa State University. Dr. Ommen has provided presentation slides…
Do you have 44.03 seconds?

44.3 Seconds. That is the average amount of time it takes for a visitor to provide site feedback.
Test it yourself by taking the survey.

A scientist/researcherA member of the forensic science communityA journalist/publicationA studentOther. Please indicate.

Learn more about CSAFE overall.Discover research CSAFE is undertaking.Explore collaboration opportunities.Find tools and education opportunities.Other. Please indicate.