{"id":12688,"date":"2021-10-30T11:16:53","date_gmt":"2021-10-30T16:16:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/"},"modified":"2022-12-16T08:26:10","modified_gmt":"2022-12-16T14:26:10","slug":"state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008","status":"publish","type":"cases","link":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/","title":{"rendered":"State v. Williams, 974 So.2d 157 (La. Ct. App. 2008)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;The use of expert testimony to identify spent cartridge cases or bullets to a particular firearm has a long history in Louisiana and elsewhere and has been the subject of Daubert challenges in other jurisdictions. . . . The Monteiro case discusses the available literature and evidence regarding the error rate in firearms examination and identification and observes that the extant information about examiner error is limited in its usefulness by the methodology of the studies so far conducted on that topic.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>State v. Williams, 974 So.2d 157 (La. Ct. App. 2008) - Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/\",\"name\":\"State v. Williams, 974 So.2d 157 (La. Ct. App. 2008) - Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-10-30T16:16:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-16T14:26:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cases\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"State v. Williams, 974 So.2d 157 (La. Ct. App. 2008)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/\",\"name\":\"Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"CSAFE\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence\",\"alternateName\":\"CSAFE\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/csafe-logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/csafe-logo.jpg\",\"width\":576,\"height\":360,\"caption\":\"Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State v. Williams, 974 So.2d 157 (La. Ct. App. 2008) - Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/","url":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/","name":"State v. Williams, 974 So.2d 157 (La. Ct. App. 2008) - Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-10-30T16:16:53+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-16T14:26:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/state-v-williams-974-so-2d-157-la-ct-app-2008\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cases","item":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/cases\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"State v. Williams, 974 So.2d 157 (La. Ct. App. 2008)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/","name":"Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/#organization"},"alternateName":"CSAFE","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/#organization","name":"Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence","alternateName":"CSAFE","url":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/csafe-logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/csafe-logo.jpg","width":576,"height":360,"caption":"Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cases\/12688"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cases"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/cases"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forensicstats.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}