
Journal: Forensic Science International
Published: 2020
Primary Author: Susan VanderPlas
Secondary Authors: Melissa Nally, Tyler Klep, Cristina Cadevall, Heike Hofmann
Type: Publication
Research Area: Firearms and Toolmarks
Recent advances in microscopy have made it possible to collect 3D topographic data, enabling more precise virtual comparisons based on the collected 3D data as a supplement to traditional comparison microscopy and 2D photography. Automatic comparison algorithms have been introduced for various scenarios, such as matching cartridge cases[1],[2] or matching bullet striae[3],[4],[5]. One key aspect of validating these automatic comparison algorithms is to evaluate the performance of the algorithm on external tests, that is, using data which were not used to train the algorithm. Here, we present a discussion of the performance of the matching algorithm[6] in three studies conducted using different Ruger weapons. We consider the performance of three scoring measures: random forest score, cross correlation, and consecutive matching striae (CMS) at the land-to-land level and, using Sequential Average Maxima scores, also at the bullet-to bullet level. Cross correlation and random forest scores both result in perfect discrimination of same-source and different-source bullets. At the land-to-land level, discrimination for both cross correlation and random forest scores (based on area under the curve, AUC) is excellent (≥0.90).
Related Resources


Forensic Footwear: A Retrospective of the Development of the MANTIS Shoe Scanning System
July 10, 2025
There currently are no shoe-scanning devices developed in the United States that can operate in a real-world, variable-weather environment in …

Examiner consistency in perceptions of fingerprint minutia rarity
July 10, 2025
Friction ridge examiners (FREs) identify distinctive features (minutiae) in fingerprints and consider how rare these observed minutiae are in their …