This presentation examines the reliability of forensic evidence, including limitations of current techniques, how jurors evaluate evidence and the importance of match language, method information and error acknowledgements. The presentation also looks at the impact of proficiency testing and error aversions, reliability in laboratory settings and impacts of eyewitness testimony.
The Reliability of Forensics
Conference/Workshop:
University of Glasgow School of Law Presentation
University of Glasgow School of Law Presentation
Published: 2019
Primary Author: Brandon Garrett
Type: Presentation Slides
Research Area: Implementation and Practice
Related Resources
What’s in a Name? Consistency in Latent Print Examiners’ Naming Conventions and Perceptions of Minutiae Frequency
Fingerprint minutia types influence LPEs’ decision-making processes during analysis and evaluation, with features perceived to be rarer generally given more weight. However, no large-scale studies comparing examiner perceptions of minutiae…
Shifting decision thresholds can undermine the probative value and legal utility of forensic pattern-matching evidence
Forensic pattern analysis requires examiners to compare the patterns of items such as fingerprints or tool marks to assess whether they have a common source. This article uses signal detection…
The Contribution of Forensic and Expert Evidence to DNA Exoneration Cases: An Interim Report
This report is from Simon A. Cole, Vanessa Meterko, Sarah Chu, Glinda Cooper, Jessica Weinstock Paredes, Maurice Possley, and Ken Otterbourg (2022), The Contribution of Forensic and Expert Evidence to…
CSAFE Project Update & ASCLD FRC Collaboration
This presentation highlighted CSAFE’s collaboration with the ASCLD FRC Collaboration Hub.