This presentation examines the reliability of forensic evidence, including limitations of current techniques, how jurors evaluate evidence and the importance of match language, method information and error acknowledgements. The presentation also looks at the impact of proficiency testing and error aversions, reliability in laboratory settings and impacts of eyewitness testimony.
The Reliability of Forensics
Conference/Workshop:
University of Glasgow School of Law Presentation
University of Glasgow School of Law Presentation
Published: 2019
Primary Author: Brandon Garrett
Type: Presentation Slides
Research Area: Implementation and Practice
Related Resources
Judges and forensic science education: A national survey
In criminal cases, forensic science reports and expert testimony play an increasingly important role in adjudication. More states now follow a federal reliability standard, which calls upon judges to assess…
Juror appraisals of forensic evidence: Effects of blind proficiency and cross-examination
Forensic testimony plays a crucial role in many criminal cases, with requests to crime laboratories steadily increasing. As part of efforts to improve the reliability of forensic evidence, scientific and…
Mock Jurors’ Evaluation of Firearm Examiner Testimony
Objectives: Firearms experts traditionally have testified that a weapon leaves “unique” toolmarks, so bullets or cartridge casings can be visually examined and conclusively matched to a particular firearm. Recently, due…
Mock Juror Perceptions of Forensics
This CSAFE Center Wide webinar was presented on December 8, 2020 by: Brandon Garrett – L. Neil Williams Professor of Law, Faculty Director at the Wilson Center for Science and…