Skip to content

Statistical Thinking for Forensic Practitioners Short Course – Session 2

Session 2 of this three-part CSAFE short course was held on April 9, 2021.

Presenter:

Alicia Carriquiry
Distinguished Professor in the Department of Statistics, CSAFE Director

Presentation Description:

Statistical ideas such as sampling, point and interval estimation of population quantities, and hypothesis testing have direct application in forensic science. In this session, we start from fundamental ideas about variability (and its sources) in measurements used in forensic analysis, and discuss methods to ameliorate, quantify, model, and interpret variation and uncertainty in the evaluation of forensic evidence. In more detail, we will:

  • Talk about variability and its sources, and introduce ideas such as reproducibility, repeatability, and accuracy.
  • Briefly talk about populations and samples, and describe some sampling methods useful in forensic applications.
  • Introduce the idea of estimation of population quantities such as means and proportions and of methods to report the uncertainty attached to those estimates.
  • Describe how to carry out a test of hypothesis to compare two means and a test of equivalence to compare two means.
  • Demonstrate how statistical concepts can be used in the study of current forensic science practice (e.g., design and analysis of black box studies)Probability Concepts and their Relevance to Forensic Science is the first session in the three-session short course, Statistical Thinking for Forensic
  • Practitioners.

Related Resources

An Overview and Comparison of Software Tools for Quantifying Value of Handwriting Evidence

An Overview and Comparison of Software Tools for Quantifying Value of Handwriting Evidence

This presentation is from the 77th Annual Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Baltimore, Maryland, February 17-22, 2025. Posted with permission of CSAFE.
How signature complexity affects expert and lay ability to distinguish genuine, disguised and simulated signatures

How signature complexity affects expert and lay ability to distinguish genuine, disguised and simulated signatures

This study examined how variations in signature complexity affected the ability of forensic document examiners (FDEs) and laypeople to determine whether signatures are authentic or simulated (forged), as well as…
Score-based Likelihood Ratios Using Stylometric Text Embeddings

Score-based Likelihood Ratios Using Stylometric Text Embeddings

We consider the problem setting in which we have two sets of texts in digital form and would like to quantify our beliefs that the two sets of texts were…