Skip to content

Shining a Light on Black Box Studies

Primary Author: Kori Khan
Secondary Authors: Alicia Carriquiry
Type: Webinar

This CSAFE webinar was held on April 22, 2022.

Presenters:
Dr. Kori Khan
Iowa State University

Dr. Alicia Carriquiry
Iowa State University

Presentation Description:
The American criminal justice system heavily relies on conclusions reached by the forensic science community. In the last ten years, there has been an increased interest in assessing the validity of the methods used to reach such conclusions. For pattern comparison disciplines, however, this can be difficult because the methods employed rely on visual examinations and subjective determinations. Recently, “black box studies” have been put forward as the gold standard for estimating the rate of errors a discipline makes to assist judges in assessing the validity and admissibility of the analysis of forensic evidence. These studies have since been conducted for various disciplines and their findings are used by judges across the country to justify the admission of forensic evidence testimony. These black box studies suffer from flawed experimental designs and inappropriate statistical analyses. We show that these limitations likely underestimate error rates and preclude researchers from making conclusions about a discipline’s error rates. With a view to future studies, we propose minimal statistical criteria for black box studies and describe some of the data that need to be available to plan and implement such studies.

Webinar Recording:

Read more about the study in this post

Related Resources

The q–q Boxplot

The q–q Boxplot

Boxplots have become an extremely popular display of distribution summaries for collections of data, especially when we need to visualize summaries for several collections simultaneously. The whiskers in the boxplot…
The Contribution of Forensic and Expert Evidence to DNA Exoneration Cases: An Interim Report

The Contribution of Forensic and Expert Evidence to DNA Exoneration Cases: An Interim Report

This report is from Simon A. Cole, Vanessa Meterko, Sarah Chu, Glinda Cooper, Jessica Weinstock Paredes, Maurice Possley, and Ken Otterbourg (2022), The Contribution of Forensic and Expert Evidence to…
Likelihood ratios for categorical count data with applications in digital forensics

Likelihood ratios for categorical count data with applications in digital forensics

We consider the forensic context in which the goal is to assess whether two sets of observed data came from the same source or from different sources. In particular, we…
CSAFE Project Update & ASCLD FRC Collaboration

CSAFE Project Update & ASCLD FRC Collaboration

This presentation highlighted CSAFE’s collaboration with the ASCLD FRC Collaboration Hub.