Forensics studies of feature-based comparison decisions typically focus on the accuracy and reliability the decisions. Decisions can be reports in the form of binary conclusions (value / no value) or in the form of ordered categories. In general there is limited covariate information available about either the examiners or the forensic samples being assessed. We propose a methodology to identify groups of examiners that might share decision making abilities or thresholds for decisions. Identifying clusters of examiners can enable us to assess reliability of decisions within these clusters which may be different from the reliability that is evaluated through marginalized data.
Reliability for Binary and Ordinal Data in Forensics
Conference/Workshop:
2022 Joint Statistical Meetings
2022 Joint Statistical Meetings
Published: 2022
Primary Author: Hina Arora
Secondary Authors: Naomi Kaplan-Damary, Hal Stern
Type: Poster
Research Area: Forensic Statistics
Related Resources
Score-based Likelihood Ratios Using Stylometric Text Embeddings
We consider the problem setting in which we have two sets of texts in digital form and would like to quantify our beliefs that the two sets of texts were…
Statistics and its Applications in Forensic Science and the Criminal Justice System
This presentation is from the 2024 Joint Statistical Meetings (JSM), Portland, Oregon, August 3-8, 2024.
Algorithmic matching of striated tool marks
Automatic matching algorithms for assessing the similarity between striation marks have been investigated for bullet lands and some tool marks, such as screwdrivers. We are interested in the investigation of…
Silencing the Defense Expert
In the wake of the 2009 NRC and 2016 PCAST Reports, the Firearms and Toolmark (FATM) discipline has come under increasing scrutiny. Validation studies like AMES I, Keisler, AMES II,…