Skip to content

Perceptions and estimates of error rates in forensic science: A survey of forensic analysts

Conference/Workshop:
American Academy of Forensic Sciences Annual Scientific Meeting
Published: 2019
Primary Author: Daniel C. Murrie
Secondary Authors: Brett O. Gardner, Sharon Kelley, Kellyn Blaisdell

The goal of this presentation is to educate attendees about commonly held beliefs of forensic analysts across multiple disciplines
regarding the prevalence and acceptability of different types of errors (i.e., false positive and false negative errors) in their field.

Related Resources

Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae

Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae

Learning Objectives: Attendees will learn about the protocols developed to assess the content of latent print examiners’ responses to questions about use of minutiae frequencies in case work as well…
Close Non-Matches and Database Searches

Close Non-Matches and Database Searches

This presentation is from the 77th Annual Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Baltimore, Maryland, February 17-22, 2025.f
An Overview and Comparison of Software Tools for Quantifying Value of Handwriting Evidence

An Overview and Comparison of Software Tools for Quantifying Value of Handwriting Evidence

This presentation is from the 77th Annual Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Baltimore, Maryland, February 17-22, 2025. Posted with permission of CSAFE.