The goal of this presentation is to educate attendees about commonly held beliefs of forensic analysts across multiple disciplines
regarding the prevalence and acceptability of different types of errors (i.e., false positive and false negative errors) in their field.
Perceptions and estimates of error rates in forensic science: A survey of forensic analysts
Conference/Workshop:
American Academy of Forensic Sciences Annual Scientific Meeting
American Academy of Forensic Sciences Annual Scientific Meeting
Published: 2019
Primary Author: Daniel C. Murrie
Secondary Authors: Brett O. Gardner, Sharon Kelley, Kellyn Blaisdell
Type: Presentation Slides
Research Area: Implementation and Practice
Related Resources
Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process
This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of…
Jury Perception of Bullet Matching Algorithms and Demonstrative Evidence
Presented at Joint Statistical Meetings
Unpacking the Sources of Error in Forensic Evidence
An overview of the Autopsy of a Crime Lab book and the ways in which error can occur in forensic evidence
Autopsy of a Crime Lab: Addressing the Sources of Error in Forensics
Keynote presentation: Autopsy of a Crime Lab book and overview of IMPL 1 Project Area