Skip to content

Modeling And iNventory of Tread Impression System (MANTIS): The development, deployment and application of an active footwear data collection system

Primary Author: Richard Stone
Secondary Authors: Susan VanderPlas
Type: Webinar

This CSAFE webinar was held on March 24, 2022.

Presenters:
Dr. Richard Stone
Iowa State University

Dr. Susan Vanderplas
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Presentation Description:
This webinar details the development, capabilities and successful deployment of the Modeling And iNventory of Tread Impression System (MANTIS). MANTIS Optics Scanner takes real time video of gait as the shoe comes in contact with the cover place (again the clear portion). It synchronizes a series of video cameras to create a detailed image of the shoe that can later be processed by software such as Sift + Ransac to create the tread pattern for comparison. The cameras capture between 8 to 15 megapixels for the configuration below (four cameras located in the housing). The use of video optics is expandable to utilize the laser scanning option, though the current utilization focuses on optical capture, thus allowing for tread capture during dynamic movement, i.e. a person walking or running across the system.

Webinar Recording:

Related Resources

Towards a likelihood ratio approach for bloodstain pattern analysis

Towards a likelihood ratio approach for bloodstain pattern analysis

In this work, we explore the application of likelihood ratio as a forensic evidence assessment tool to evaluate the causal mechanism of a bloodstain pattern. It is assumed that there…
An Open-Source Implementation of the CMPS Algorithm for Assessing Similarity of Bullets

An Open-Source Implementation of the CMPS Algorithm for Assessing Similarity of Bullets

In this paper, we introduce the R package cmpsR, an open-source implementation of the Congruent Matching Profile Segments (CMPS) method developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)…
Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of…