In forensic investigations, the goal of evidence evaluation is often to address source-/identity-based questions in which the evidence consists of two sets of observations: one from an unknown source tied to a crime and the other from a known source. A widely accepted statistical approach to this problem is to compute a likelihood ratio that measures the relative probability of the evidence assuming that the known source either did or did not also generate the unknown-source criminal data. In this work, we develop a Bayesian approach to computing the likelihood ratio when the evidence is categorical count data and show how the likelihood ratio can be expressed in closed form under our model. We also analyze the theoretical impact of the prior through its effect on the likelihood ratio, rather than through the more traditional lens of the effect on posterior inference. Our approach is motivated by comparing users’ behavioral patterns in digital forensics, where user-generated events belong to a set of categories of forensic interest. We illustrate the potential efficacy of our proposed method by presenting results from experiments using three real-world digital event datasets.
Likelihood Ratios for Categorical Evidence with Applications to Digital Forensics

Conference/Workshop:
Joint Statistical Meetings (JSM)
Joint Statistical Meetings (JSM)
Published: 2022
Primary Author: Rachel Longjohn
Secondary Authors: Padhraic Smyth
Type: Poster
Related Resources
Score-based Likelihood Ratios Using Stylometric Text Embeddings
We consider the problem setting in which we have two sets of texts in digital form and would like to quantify our beliefs that the two sets of texts were…
Statistics and its Applications in Forensic Science and the Criminal Justice System
This presentation is from the 2024 Joint Statistical Meetings (JSM), Portland, Oregon, August 3-8, 2024.
Algorithmic matching of striated tool marks
Automatic matching algorithms for assessing the similarity between striation marks have been investigated for bullet lands and some tool marks, such as screwdrivers. We are interested in the investigation of…
Silencing the Defense Expert
In the wake of the 2009 NRC and 2016 PCAST Reports, the Firearms and Toolmark (FATM) discipline has come under increasing scrutiny. Validation studies like AMES I, Keisler, AMES II,…