Is there a CSI effect for lawyers? Forensic evidence plays an increasingly prominent role in criminal practice, leading some to worry that depictions of forensics in popular media might make jurors over-reliant on forensics-a so called CSI effect. There is little empirical evidence of a CSI effect among jury eligible laypersons, and, even if the effect may afflict some, its influence depends upon a case proceeding to a trial. As the Supreme Court has put it: “criminal justice today is for the most part a system of pleas, not a system of trials.” However, a CSI effect could be more consequential if it affects how criminal lawyers assess forensic evidence when they negotiate pleas or decide what evidence to present at trial. In this Article, we begin to examine how lawyers evaluate forensic evidence.
Forensics and Fallibility: Comparing the Views of Lawyers and Judges
Journal: West Virginia Law Review
Published: 2016
Primary Author: Brandon Garrett
Secondary Authors: G. Mitchell
Type: Publication
Related Resources
Advancing the Understanding of 3D Imaging for Firearms Identification
Houston Forensic Science Center, in collaboration with CSAFE, has been awarded an NIJ grant to conduct a study focused on comparability of images acquired by 3D instruments manufactured by different…
Computational Shoeprint Analysis for Forensic Science
Shoeprints are a common type of evidence found at crime scenes and are regularly used in forensic investigations. However, their utility is limited by the lack of reference footwear databases…
Score-based Likelihood Ratios Using Stylometric Text Embeddings
We consider the problem setting in which we have two sets of texts in digital form and would like to quantify our beliefs that the two sets of texts were…
How do Labs Ensure Quality? A Nationwide Review of SOPs for Latent Print Examination
This presentation is from the 108th International Association for Identification (IAI) Annual Educational Conference, Reno, Nevada, August 11-17, 2024. Posted with permission of CSAFE.