Skip to content

Forensics and Fallibility: Comparing the Views of Lawyers and Judges

Journal: West Virginia Law Review
Published: 2016
Primary Author: Brandon Garrett
Secondary Authors: G. Mitchell

Is there a CSI effect for lawyers? Forensic evidence plays an increasingly prominent role in criminal practice, leading some to worry that depictions of forensics in popular media might make jurors over-reliant on forensics-a so called CSI effect. There is little empirical evidence of a CSI effect among jury eligible laypersons, and, even if the effect may afflict some, its influence depends upon a case proceeding to a trial. As the Supreme Court has put it: “criminal justice today is for the most part a system of pleas, not a system of trials.” However, a CSI effect could be more consequential if it affects how criminal lawyers assess forensic evidence when they negotiate pleas or decide what evidence to present at trial. In this Article, we begin to examine how lawyers evaluate forensic evidence.

Related Resources

The q–q Boxplot

The q–q Boxplot

Boxplots have become an extremely popular display of distribution summaries for collections of data, especially when we need to visualize summaries for several collections simultaneously. The whiskers in the boxplot…
A Study in Reproducibility: The Congruent Matching Cells Algorithm and cmcR Package

A Study in Reproducibility: The Congruent Matching Cells Algorithm and cmcR Package

Scientific research is driven by our ability to use methods, procedures, and materials from previous studies and further research by adding to it. As the need for computationally-intensive methods to…
Forensic Science in Legal Education

Forensic Science in Legal Education

In criminal cases, forensic science reports and expert testimony play an increasingly important role in adjudication. More states now follow a federal reliability standard, following Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals…
The Contribution of Forensic and Expert Evidence to DNA Exoneration Cases: An Interim Report

The Contribution of Forensic and Expert Evidence to DNA Exoneration Cases: An Interim Report

This report is from Simon A. Cole, Vanessa Meterko, Sarah Chu, Glinda Cooper, Jessica Weinstock Paredes, Maurice Possley, and Ken Otterbourg (2022), The Contribution of Forensic and Expert Evidence to…