Skip to content

Explaining Source Conclusions to a Lay Audience

This CSAFE Center Wide Meeting Webinar was presented by Dr. William (Bill) Thompson from University of California, Irvine on November 30, 2017.

Description:
Forensic scientists are often asked to evaluate whether two items have (or might have) a common source. What is the best way for them to explain the strength of their conclusions in reports and testimony? This presentation will review a number of options, discussing both the logical foundations of each approach and what social science research tells us about how well various presentation formats are likely to be understood by a lay audience. The presentation will focus particularly on the risk that statistical data will be misunderstood or used inappropriately to draw fallacious conclusions, and on possible steps to mitigate that risk.

Related Resources

Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of…
Unpacking the Sources of Error in Forensic Evidence

Unpacking the Sources of Error in Forensic Evidence

An overview of the Autopsy of a Crime Lab book and the ways in which error can occur in forensic evidence
Autopsy of a Crime Lab: Addressing the Sources of Error in Forensics

Autopsy of a Crime Lab: Addressing the Sources of Error in Forensics

Keynote presentation:  Autopsy of a Crime Lab book and overview of IMPL 1 Project Area