We consider matching problems where the goal is to determine whether two observations randomly drawn from a population with multiple (sub)groups are from the same (sub)group. This is a key question in forensic science, where items with unidentified origins from suspects and crime scenes are compared to objects from a known set of sources to see if they originated from the same source. We derive the optimal matching rule under known density functions of data that minimizes the decision error probabilities. Empirically, the proposed matching rule is computed by plugging parametrically estimated density functions using training data into the formula of the optimal matching rule. The connections between the optimal matching rule and existing methods in forensic science are explained. In particular, we contrast the optimal matching rule to classification and also compare it to a score-based approach that relies on similarity features extracted from paired items. Numerical simulations are conducted to evaluate the proposed method and show that it outperforms the existing methods in terms of a higher ROC curve and higher power to identify matched pairs of items. We also demonstrate the utility of the proposed method by applying it to a real forensic data analysis of glass fragments.
Density-based matching rule: Optimality, estimation, and application in forensic problems
Journal: Annals of Applied Statistics
Published: 2024
Primary Author: Hana Lee
Secondary Authors: Yumou Qiu, Alicia Carriquiry, Danica Ommen
Research Area: Forensic Statistics
Related Resources
Forensic Footwear: A Retrospective of the Development of the MANTIS Shoe Scanning System
There currently are no shoe-scanning devices developed in the United States that can operate in a real-world, variable-weather environment in real-time. Forensics-focused groups, including the NIJ, expressed the need for…
Examiner consistency in perceptions of fingerprint minutia rarity
Friction ridge examiners (FREs) identify distinctive features (minutiae) in fingerprints and consider how rare these observed minutiae are in their decisions about both the value of a fingerprint and whether…
Incorrect statistical reasoning in Guyll et al. leads to biased claims about strength of forensic evidence
Guyll et al. (1) make an error in statistical reasoning that could lead judges and jurors in criminal trials to grossly misinterpret forensic evidence. Their error leads to highly inflated…
Interoperability Study of 3D Instruments Used in Firearms Identification
In forensic firearms identification, one of the newest emerging technologies is three-dimensional (3D) imaging. The 3D technology allows firearms examiners to virtually compare high-resolution 3D images of the surfaces of…



