Skip to content

Crime Lab Proficiency Testing and Quality Management

Type: Webinar
Research Area: Latent Print

In the wake of recent reports documenting the vulnerability of forensic science methodologies to human error (e.g., NAS, 2009; PCAST, 2016), the field has sometimes pointed to proficiency testing as evidence of disciplines’ validity and/or reliability.  However, current proficiency procedures have been criticized on multiple fronts, with some scholars calling for blind proficiency testing (e.g., Koehler, 2008; 2013).  The Houston Forensic Science Center (HFSC) is a local government corporation that provides forensic services to the city of Houston and surrounding areas.  In 2015, HFSC adopted recommendations for blind proficiency testing by implementing a blind quality control program.  The program has expanded to include almost all units within the laboratory.  The objective of the program is to supplement mandatory proficiency tests as well as to provide real-time assessment of analysis procedures, determine areas of improvement, and ensure that stakeholders are receiving accurate and reliable results.  This webinar will detail the origin, maintenance, and benefits of HFSC’s blind quality control program within the Latent Print Comparison section.  HFSC personnel will also describe obstacles to the implementation of the program and feasible solutions.  CSAFE and HFSC are working closely to improve the blind program and use collected data to inform the larger field of forensic science.

By the end of this presentation, participants will be able to:

  1. Identify and discuss the need for quality management beyond traditional proficiency tests.
  2. Describe how one laboratory successfully implemented a blind quality control program, using the latent print comparison unit as an illustrative example.
  3. Identify hurdles, and solutions, to the implementation of a blind quality control program.

Presenters:  Brett Gardner, Sharon Kelley, & Daniel Murrie,  University of Virginia
                          Maddisen Neuman, Callan Hundl, Rebecca Green, & Alicia Rairden, Houston Forensic Science Center

Related Resources

Commentary on Curley et al. Assessing cognitive bias in forensic decisions: a review and outlook

Commentary on Curley et al. Assessing cognitive bias in forensic decisions: a review and outlook

In their recent critical review titled “Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook,” Curley et al. (1) offer a confused and incomplete discussion of “task relevance” in…
A Survey of Fingerprint Examiners' Attitudes towards Probabilistic Reporting

A Survey of Fingerprint Examiners' Attitudes towards Probabilistic Reporting

This CSAFE webinar was held on September 22, 2021. Presenter: Simon Cole University of California, Irvine Presentation Description: Over the past decade, with increasing scientific scrutiny on forensic reporting practices,…
Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance

Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance

Calls for blind proficiency testing in forensic science disciplines intensified following the 2009 National Academy of Sciences report and were echoed in the 2016 report by the President’s Council of…
CSAFE 2021 Field Update

CSAFE 2021 Field Update

The 2021 Field Update was held June 14, 2021, and served as the closing to the first year of CSAFE 2.0. CSAFE brought together researchers, forensic science partners and interested…