# Covering the Basic Concepts Surrounding the Weight and Strength of Evidence

Research Area: Forensic Statistics

This CSAFE Center Wide webinar was presented on January 7, 2019 by Dr. Danica Ommen, CSAFE researcher and Assistant Professor at Iowa State University. Dr. Ommen has provided presentation slides for Part 1 and Part 2 and references.

Presentation Description:

In this two-part presentation, we will focus on aspects of the forensic identification of source problems where the main question of interest is determining the origin of evidence with unknown source.  In order to solve this problem, we need to determine the value of the evidence with respect to two competing propositions for its origin by computing some type of “likelihood ratio.”  After we get this value of evidence, the idea is that it can be used to help someone make a decision.  In the case of a criminal trial, the decision would be regarding the guilt or innocence of the defendant.  However, there are many different ideas about what the “likelihood ratio” should look like and how to compute its value, especially in the face of uncertainty.  Often, we are uncertain about the statistical models we’ve chosen to describe the evidence.  In this presentation, we will discuss the basic definitions, as well as various computational strategies, for both the weight and the value of evidence.  In addition, we will review and discuss recent controversies surrounding the value of evidence.

Part 1

Part 2

## Related Resources

#### Source Camera Identification with Multi-Camera Smartphones

An overview of source camera identification on multi-camera smartphones, and introduction to the new CSAFE multi-camera smartphone image database, and a summary of recent results on the iPhone 14 Pro’s.

#### An alternative statistical framework for measuring proficiency

Item Response Theory, a class of statistical methods used prominently in educational testing, can be used to measure LPE proficiency in annual tests or research studies, while simultaneously accounting for…

#### Examiner variability in pattern evidence: proficiency, inconclusive tendency, and reporting styles

The current approach to characterizing uncertainty in pattern evidence disciplines has focused on error rate studies, which provide aggregated error rates over many examiners and pieces of evidence. However, decisions…

#### Statistical Interpretation and Reporting of Fingerprint Evidence: FRStat Introduction and Overview

The FRStat is a tool designed to help quantify the strength of fingerprint evidence. Following lengthy development and validation with assistance from CSAFE and NIST, in 2017 the FRStat was…