Skip to content

Algorithm mismatch in spatial steganalysis

Conference/Workshop:
IS&T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging, Media Watermarking, Security, and Forensics 2019
Published: 2019
Primary Author: Stephanie Reinders
Secondary Authors: Li Lin, Yong Guan, Min Wu, Jennifer Newman
Research Area: Digital

The number and availability of stegonographic embedding algorithms continues to grow. Many traditional blind steganalysis frameworks require training examples from every embedding algorithm, but collecting, storing and processing representative examples of each algorithm can quickly become untenable. Our motivation for this paper is to create a straight-forward, nondata-intensive framework for blind steganalysis that only requires examples of cover images and a single embedding algorithm for training. Our blind steganalysis framework addresses the case of algorithm mismatch, where a classifier is trained on one algorithm and tested on another, with four spatial embedding algorithms: LSB matching, MiPOD, S-UNIWARD and WOW.

We use RAW image data from the BOSSbase database and and data collected from six iPhone devices. Ensemble Classifiers with Spatial Rich Model features are trained on a single embedding algorithm and tested on each of the four algorithms. Classifiers trained on MiPOD, S-UNIWARD and WOW data achieve decent error rates when testing on all four algorithms. Most notably, an Ensemble Classifier with an adjusted decision threshold trained on LSB matching data achieves decent detection results on MiPOD, S-UNIWARD and WOW data.

Related Resources

LibDroid: Summarizing information flow of Android Native Libraries via Static Analysis

LibDroid: Summarizing information flow of Android Native Libraries via Static Analysis

With advancements in technology, people are taking advantage of mobile devices to access e-mails, search the web, and video chat. Therefore, extracting evidence from mobile phones is an important component…
Evaluating Reference Sets for Score-Based Likelihood Ratios for Camera Device Identification

Evaluating Reference Sets for Score-Based Likelihood Ratios for Camera Device Identification

An investigator wants to know if an illicit image captured by an unknown camera was taken by a person of interest’s (POI’s) phone. Score-based likelihood ratios (SLRs) have been used…
Likelihood Ratios for Categorical Evidence with Applications to Digital Forensics

Likelihood Ratios for Categorical Evidence with Applications to Digital Forensics

In forensic investigations, the goal of evidence evaluation is often to address source-/identity-based questions in which the evidence consists of two sets of observations: one from an unknown source tied…
Automatic Detection of Android Steganography Apps via Symbolic Execution and Tree Matching

Automatic Detection of Android Steganography Apps via Symbolic Execution and Tree Matching

The recent focus of cyber security on automated detection of malware for Android apps has omitted the study of some apps used for “legitimate” purposes, such as steganography apps. Mobile…