Big changes are occurring in forensic science, particularly among experts who compare the patterns found in fingerprints, footwear impressions, toolmarks, handwriting, and the like. Forensic examiners are reaching conclusions in new ways and changing the language they use in reports and testimony. This article explains these changes and the challenges they pose for lawyers and judges.
After Uniqueness: The Evolution of Forensic Science Opinion
Journal: Judicature
Published: 2018
Primary Author: Alex Biedermann
Secondary Authors: William C. Thompson, Joelle Vuille, Franco Taroni
Type: Publication
Research Area: Implementation and Practice
Related Resources
Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae
Learning Objectives: Attendees will learn about the protocols developed to assess the content of latent print examiners’ responses to questions about use of minutiae frequencies in case work as well…
Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae
Learning Objectives: Attendees will learn about the protocols developed to assess the content of latent print examiners’ responses to questions about use of minutiae frequencies in case work as well…
Examiner consistency in perceptions of fingerprint minutia rarity
Friction ridge examiners (FREs) identify distinctive features (minutiae) in fingerprints and consider how rare these observed minutiae are in their decisions about both the value of a fingerprint and whether…
A Survey of Naming Conventions for Different Minutia Types in Friction Ridge Examination
Latent print examiners (LPEs) consider the type and rarity of the features found within friction ridge impressions when determining the suitability of questioned impressions for comparison and when forming opinions…