Big changes are occurring in forensic science, particularly among experts who compare the patterns found in fingerprints, footwear impressions, toolmarks, handwriting, and the like. Forensic examiners are reaching conclusions in new ways and changing the language they use in reports and testimony. This article explains these changes and the challenges they pose for lawyers and judges.
After Uniqueness: The Evolution of Forensic Science Opinion
Journal: Judicature
Published: 2018
Primary Author: Alex Biedermann
Secondary Authors: William C. Thompson, Joelle Vuille, Franco Taroni
Type: Publication
Research Area: Implementation and Practice
Related Resources
Juror appraisals of forensic evidence: Effects of blind proficiency and cross-examination
Forensic testimony plays a crucial role in many criminal cases, with requests to crime laboratories steadily increasing. As part of efforts to improve the reliability of forensic evidence, scientific and…
Mock Jurors’ Evaluation of Firearm Examiner Testimony
Objectives: Firearms experts traditionally have testified that a weapon leaves “unique” toolmarks, so bullets or cartridge casings can be visually examined and conclusively matched to a particular firearm. Recently, due…
Mock Juror Perceptions of Forensics
This CSAFE Center Wide webinar was presented on December 8, 2020 by: Brandon Garrett – L. Neil Williams Professor of Law, Faculty Director at the Wilson Center for Science and…
A Pioneer in Forensic Science Reform: The Work of Paul Giannelli
Few can say, “I told you so,” to our entire criminal justice system. Being right about what is wrong with the use of evidence in criminal cases is not a…