Big changes are occurring in forensic science, particularly among experts who compare the patterns found in fingerprints, footwear impressions, toolmarks, handwriting, and the like. Forensic examiners are reaching conclusions in new ways and changing the language they use in reports and testimony. This article explains these changes and the challenges they pose for lawyers and judges.
After Uniqueness: The Evolution of Forensic Science Opinion
Journal: Judicature
Published: 2018
Primary Author: Alex Biedermann
Secondary Authors: William C. Thompson, Joelle Vuille, Franco Taroni
Type: Publication
Research Area: Implementation and Practice
Related Resources
Blind Testing in Firearms Examination: Preliminary Results, Benefits, Limitations, and Future Directions
This CSAFE webinar was held on June 23, 2022. Presenters: Maddisen Neuman Quality / Research Associate, Houston Forensic Science Center Presentation Description: Open proficiency tests created by external vendors…
Surveying Practicing Firearm Examiners
A sample (n = 79) of practicing firearm and toolmark examiners was queried about casework as well as their views about the potential role that statistics might play in future…
Blind testing in firearms: Preliminary results from a blind quality control program
Open proficiency tests meet accreditation requirements and measure examiner competence but may not represent actual casework. In December 2015, the Houston Forensic Science Center began a blind quality control program…
Extracting Case-Specific Data from Validation Studies
This CSAFE webinar was held on May 10, 2022. Presenters: Steve Lund Statistical Engineering Division, NIST Hari Iyer Statistical Engineering Division, NIST Presentation Description: The legal and scientific communities agree…