Skip to content

Adversarial Matching of Dark Net Market Vendor Accounts

Conference/Workshop:
25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
Published: 2019
Primary Author: Xiao Hui Tai
Secondary Authors: Kyle Soska, N. Christian
Research Area: Digital

Many datasets feature seemingly disparate entries that actually refer to the same entity. Reconciling these entries, or “matching,” is challenging, especially in situations where there are errors in the data. In certain contexts, the situation is even more complicated: an active adversary may have a vested interest in having the matching process fail. By leveraging eight years of data, we investigate one such adversarial context: matching different online anonymous marketplace vendor handles to unique sellers. Using a combination of random forest classifiers and hierarchical clustering on a set of features that would be hard for an adversary to forge or mimic, we manage to obtain reasonable performance (over 75% precision and recall on labels generated using heuristics), despite generally lacking any ground truth for training. Our algorithm performs particularly well for the top 30% of accounts by sales volume, and hints that 22,163 accounts with at least one confirmed sale map to 15,652 distinct sellers—of which 12,155 operate only one account, and the remainder between 2 and 11 different accounts. Case study analysis further confirms that our algorithm manages to identify non-trivial matches, as well as impersonation attempts.

Related Resources

Close Non-Matches and Database Searches

Close Non-Matches and Database Searches

This presentation is from the 77th Annual Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Baltimore, Maryland, February 17-22, 2025.f
Quantitative Similarity Assessments of Forensic Images

Quantitative Similarity Assessments of Forensic Images

This presentation is from the 77th Annual Conference of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), Baltimore, Maryland, February 17-22, 2025.
Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons

Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons

Reviews conducted by the National Academy of Sciences (2009) and the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2016) concluded that the field of forensic firearm comparisons has not…
Interoperability Study of 3D Instruments Used in Firearms Identification

Interoperability Study of 3D Instruments Used in Firearms Identification

In forensic firearms identification, one of the newest emerging technologies is three-dimensional (3D) imaging. The 3D technology allows firearms examiners to virtually compare high-resolution 3D images of the surfaces of…