Skip to content

Adapting the Chumbley Score to Match Striae on Land Engraved Areas (LEAs) of Bullets

Journal: Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published: 2019
Primary Author: Ganesh Krishnan
Secondary Authors: Heike Hofmann
Research Area: Firearms and Toolmarks

The same‐source problem remains a major challenge in forensic toolmark and firearm examination. Here, we investigate the applicability of the Chumbley method (J Forensic Sci, 2018, 63, 849; J Forensic Sci, 2010, 55, 953) (10,12), developed for screwdriver markings, for same‐source identification of striations on bullet LEAs. The Hamby datasets 44 and 252 measured by NIST and CSAFE (high‐resolution scans) are used here. We provide methods to identify parameters that minimize error rates for matching of LEAs, and a remedial algorithm to alleviate the problem of failed tests, while increasing the power of the test and reducing error rates. For 85,491 land‐to‐land comparisons (84,235 known nonmatches and 1256 known matches), the adapted test does not provide a result in 176 situations (originally more than 500). The Type I and Type II error rates are 7.2% (6105 out of 84,235) and 21.4% (271 out of 1256), respectively. This puts the proposed method on similar footing as other single‐feature matching approaches in the literature.

Related Resources

Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae

Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae

Learning Objectives: Attendees will learn about the protocols developed to assess the content of latent print examiners’ responses to questions about use of minutiae frequencies in case work as well…
Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae

Developing Reproducible Protocols and Definitions for Selecting Combined Minutiae

Learning Objectives: Attendees will learn about the protocols developed to assess the content of latent print examiners’ responses to questions about use of minutiae frequencies in case work as well…
Examiner consistency in perceptions of fingerprint minutia rarity

Examiner consistency in perceptions of fingerprint minutia rarity

Friction ridge examiners (FREs) identify distinctive features (minutiae) in fingerprints and consider how rare these observed minutiae are in their decisions about both the value of a fingerprint and whether…
A Survey of Naming Conventions for Different Minutia Types in Friction Ridge Examination

A Survey of Naming Conventions for Different Minutia Types in Friction Ridge Examination

Latent print examiners (LPEs) consider the type and rarity of the features found within friction ridge impressions when determining the suitability of questioned impressions for comparison and when forming opinions…