
Journal: Statistics and Data Science in Imaging
Published: 2024
Primary Author: Karen Kafadar
Secondary Authors: Alicia Carriquiry
Type: Publication
Research Area: Footwear, Forensic Statistics, Handwriting, Latent Print
When a crime is committed, law enforcement directs crime scene experts to obtain evidence that may be pertinent to identifying the perpetrator(s). Much of this evidence comes in the form of images, either digitally transcribed (e.g.,: fingerprints, handwriting), or as digital photographs (e.g., biometric images, photographs of patterns created by blood spatter or arson). Finding models that faithfully capture the “key features” in these images is critical: attribution of the evidence will be accurate only if these “key features” can be properly compared across different images. The huge variety in the types, shapes, and locations of such features leads to challenges in obtaining valid inferences. We describe some of these challenges, discuss some prior approaches, and suggest future directions which need to be pursued to avoid miscarriages of justice that have occurred in the absence of statistically-validated methods of inference for forensic evidence.
Related Resources


Forensic Footwear: A Retrospective of the Development of the MANTIS Shoe Scanning System
July 10, 2025
There currently are no shoe-scanning devices developed in the United States that can operate in a real-world, variable-weather environment in …

Examiner consistency in perceptions of fingerprint minutia rarity
July 10, 2025
Friction ridge examiners (FREs) identify distinctive features (minutiae) in fingerprints and consider how rare these observed minutiae are in their …