
Journal: West Virginia Law Review
Published: 2016
Primary Author: Brandon Garrett
Secondary Authors: G. Mitchell
Type: Publication
Research Area:
Is there a CSI effect for lawyers? Forensic evidence plays an increasingly prominent role in criminal practice, leading some to worry that depictions of forensics in popular media might make jurors over-reliant on forensics-a so called CSI effect. There is little empirical evidence of a CSI effect among jury eligible laypersons, and, even if the effect may afflict some, its influence depends upon a case proceeding to a trial. As the Supreme Court has put it: “criminal justice today is for the most part a system of pleas, not a system of trials.” However, a CSI effect could be more consequential if it affects how criminal lawyers assess forensic evidence when they negotiate pleas or decide what evidence to present at trial. In this Article, we begin to examine how lawyers evaluate forensic evidence.
Related Resources


Forensic Footwear: A Retrospective of the Development of the MANTIS Shoe Scanning System
July 10, 2025
There currently are no shoe-scanning devices developed in the United States that can operate in a real-world, variable-weather environment in …

Examiner consistency in perceptions of fingerprint minutia rarity
July 10, 2025
Friction ridge examiners (FREs) identify distinctive features (minutiae) in fingerprints and consider how rare these observed minutiae are in their …